We just don’t have a full sense of it,” said Richard Wallace, director of transportation systems analysis at the nonprofit Center for Automotive Research in Michigan. “We certainly think that going to significantly lower the rate of fatalities. Should they be programmed to protect their occupants at all cost, or to make a move that could seriously injure the riders but lead to fewer deaths overall in a collision? Questions have been raised about whether they could make ethical and safe decisions when confronted with complex situations that involve not only cars, but also pedestrians and other obstacles. Skepticism, and even fear of losing control of the activities that play a big role in our lives, already abound about allowing robots to manage our lives. If you have something react faster than humans, you could still save lots of lives Richard Wallace, Center for Automotive Researchĭemonstrating that autonomous cars are safe and able to reduce accidents will be crucial for convincing the public that ceding driving to computers is a good idea. Robots can potentially be programmed to make faster and better decisions while avoiding human pitfalls such as driving while drunk or texting.Ī paper from global consulting firm McKinsey & Company estimates that a 90% crash reduction rate could have saved the US economy $190bn in 2012 alone. In the remaining cases, factors such as weather and failed car components were primary causes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, however, found that over 90% of car crashes involve human error.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |